Thursday 14 February 2013

Matthew 2

International Men of Mystery

When you get used to two artists as a famous double-act it can be very odd when you see one of them working on their own.  Think of Bert without Ernie, Laurel without Hardy, one Ronnie...

We're used to the opening chapters of Matthew and Luke working as a double-act.  We blend the two together to make the nativity story and yet sometimes in doing so we lose the individual flavour of either writer by blending them.  There's a reason why single malts are often valued more than even the best blends. The total is not always greater than the sum of its parts.

Reading Matthew without Luke, as his original readers would most likely have done, we are struck by his frankly odd choice of what to prioritise.  What we think of as the "nativity story" with angels, shepherds, Mary, Joseph, stables, census, Bethlehem, and so on, is contained in this one phrase, "After Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea."

He spends much more time looking at our International Men of Mystery, these Magi, "from the East" than he does talking about the details of Jesus birth.  This is almost the exact opposite of what we do around Christmas when our "Wise Men" have little more than a walk-on part.  But who are they, these strange astrologers from who knows where?


In Christian tradition they go under a variety of different and sometimes contradictory names.  They are the Three Wise Men, Astrologers from the East, The Three Kings; they are given individual names in Western Christianity, Melchior, Caspar and Balthasar.  In Syrian Christianity they are given the names, Larvandad, Gushnasaph, and Hormisdas, the Ethiopians and Arminians have their own names for them (again widely differing from the Western ones) and in many Eastern traditions there are twelve of them and not three.

Indeed if we were to take one of their traditional titles, The Three Kings and break it down by looking at what the Bible actually says we would discover that we don’t know if there were three (we only say that based on the number of gifts) and they are certainly not kings.  The term the Bible uses for them is Magoi, the word that we get our modern word magicians from.  It appears in two other places in the Bible.  In the Greek Old Testament it is used in Daniel to talk about people who are translated as Enchanters and in Acts where it is used of man described as a “Jewish Sorcerer.”

Our translations therefore get awfully polite (as they often do) when in Matthew they either call them “wise men” or indeed give up on the idea of translating it at all and call them Magi.  This seems to be born out of embarrassment, and frankly it is a little embarrassing, that these people, however many there were and wherever they came from, were clearly not Jewish and not followers of the Law of Moses.  In that Law in Leviticus 19 we are told not to practice fortune telling or sorcery.

In the book of Isaiah those who predict the future by looking to the stars are ridiculed by the prophet and proclaimed to be people who waste their lives chasing after false hope.  Time after time in the Law and Prophets God forbids Israel from practising fortune telling and astrology, he assures them that it is wrong and lets them know that it will lead them to disaster.

Why then, if astrology is so bad, do we have these strange characters turn up within two years of Jesus being born to bring him gifts and cause all sorts of trouble for him with the local authorities?  Why does God seem to use the very tools of their religion to help them to find Jesus?  It does seem bizarre to say the least that God shows them the way to his son using stars and signs in the heavens.  Is this God saying that astrology and horoscopes are great in certain circumstances and bad in others?

One thing he is certainly not condoning here is the notion of, “Oh well, it’s only a bit of fun.”  Packing up your whole life and setting out on a four year, very dangerous, journey does not count as just a bit of fun.  What these men saw in the heavens changed their lives.  Astrology is not seen in the Bible as something merely to be toyed with.  It is powerful and only here and only once in the scriptures is it ever noted that its power is good.

Secondly given their behaviour towards Jesus and the gifts that they bring to him they seem to have developed a fairly deep understanding of who it is that they have come to see.  They come with a desire to worship him.  Now, worshipping kings was normal practice in most cultures in those days with the notable exception of the Jewish world but it is still striking that it is the foreigner and outsider who is the first to recognise the divinity of Jesus.

The gifts they bring speak powerfully of who they expect him to be and grow up to become.  Gold, Frankincense and Myrrh each have their own meanings behind them that, even with the rich accrual of meanings that they have developed over the years as legend has been added to history they still, in their most basic form carry three simple meanings.

Gold is fairly straightforward; it was as valuable then as it is now.  It is not the gift the kind of gift that a visiting dignitary would travel for two years just to bring to anybody.  This is someone that they regard as being very, very important.  You do not hear of journeys like this being made in antiquity for just any old king.  The gold and the journey say that these Magi saw Jesus as a great king.

Frankincense, like gold, is something that we are familiar with.  We know the smell of it from using it at home, Roman Catholic Mass, High Anglican Services, etc.  From those last two contexts we also have some understanding of its use in antiquity. It was used as part of the rituals of Judaism along with a great many other religions.  There was a certain practicality about its use as it covered up a lot of the smells and sights involved in the mass gathering of people and the mass slaughter of animals.  The Frankincense therefore carries with it the idea of priesthood and sacrifice.  It would not be that odd gift to give to a child born to royal, noble or high ranking parents but to give it to a child so poor that his mother gave birth in a stable would be very peculiar indeed.

The third one is by far the strangest.  Myrrh is an odd word at the best of times, just try spelling it to see what I mean but to give it to a newborn baby is just perverse.  What do I mean?  Myrrh is an oil used in embalming the dead.  Not the note you want to strike normally when visiting a new born baby and his parents.  It is the equivalent to turning up to visit a newborn at the hospital with a funeral bond or a voucher for a very expensive made to measure coffin.  You can just see the look on the faces of Mary and Joseph.  Gold comes out - big smiles all round.  Frankincense, a very expensive gift - Oh you shouldn't have!  Myrrh - No, really, you shouldn't have.

Whilst the gold and the frankincense speak of the special life that this baby will have, the myrrh says that not only his life but his death will also be special.  This much we know because we know the story of Jesus from beginning to end.  These men did not know the story as we do and yet their guesses seem to be spot on.

They may be foreigners and non-Jews but they seem to have a keener understanding of the Jewish Messiah than most of the Jewish people involved in this story.  But having seen this, we are then faced again with the question of why they are here at all and why God allows them to discover Jesus by the means that they do.  Why does he use astrology to bring people to Jesus?

I think we need to bring Saint Paul in at this point, in his sermon to the philosophers in Athens Paul talks about how God overlooked the sins of the past before people found out about Jesus.  Not only that but Paul himself uses the statues of the gods in Athens to point to Jesus.  Because of our sin and our disobedience human beings find themselves in all sorts of bad and ungodly places.  God does not stand outside of our sinful situations and shout at us from a safe place.  God’s way is that he steps in and meets us where we are.  This is, in fact, the whole message of Christmas.

God opens the conversation with the Magi in language that they understand and a religious culture that they feel comfortable with.  If I do not know your language and you do not know mine then we attempt to communicate using things that we both know.  I could start by pointing to me and saying, “William, my name is William.  William is Ainh Dom” or I could hold out a familiar everyday object to you and we could tell each other our names for it.

God is communicating with people who in a very real and spiritual sense are foreigners to him.  He speaks to them in words that they will understand.  He uses religious imagery from their own home culture.  He starts in the dangerous place of astrology where they live and brings them on a huge journey that leads them to the living embodiment of the truth and life.  He starts with the stars and through them brings these star gazers to the very person who made the stars.


At the start of our journey with God he does not expect us to have every one of our theological “I”s dotted and our “T”s crossed.  He reaches out to us in our weakness, he appears to us in our darkness but he is never happy to leave us there.  Just as he took the Magi on a two year journey that, I am sure, was only the start of a lifelong quest, so he comes to meet us where we are and calls us to take the first steps on a journey to where he is.

We each in our own way have to make that journey to Jesus.  We each must come to him to bow the knee as the Magi once did, bringing the only gift that he wants and, in fact, the only gift we can bring to him - the gift of ourselves.  If you have never made that journey in your heart I urge you strongly to do that this Christmas, turn from your old ways and put your trust in the God who trusted Mary to cradle him, Joseph to bring him up, the untrustworthy shepherds to bring the news of him to the world and these outsiders, these strangers, these Magi who had no share in the physical Israel to be the first of the new Israel made up of people from every tribe and tongue, who have little more than their love of  Jesus in common, people like you and me.

Wednesday 13 February 2013

Matthew 1

Think of all the great opening lines that you know out of all the books that you read or films that you saw - 

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times...

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife...

Matthew picks a genealogy to start with.  Hmmm.  Can you imagine a publisher today?  "Well Matthew, I like the racy bit with the potential divorce and the stuff with dreams and angels but really, a family tree at the start?  We have a man called Luke working on a similar project and he's kept his genealogy but moved it to a later chapter after he has caught the readers attention, would you not think of doing the same?"

So why does Matthew chose to start this way?

There are many different ways of telling a story.  You could write a work of prose, straightforward story telling, "One day Mr McCartney got out of bed, had a cup of tea and went out to catch the bus, etc."  You could write a poem, "From Morpheus' gentle grip / by caffeine and cold released / to waking land he slipped / etc, ect."  You could write a song, "Got up got out of bed, dragged a comb across my head, Found my way downstairs and drank a cup. And looking up, I noticed I was late, etc."  They are all different genres and all do different jobs.  The Bible also employs different genres, history, letters, proverbs, songs, poetry and, here, genealogy.

One of the most overlooked means of telling a story these days is the family tree.  Barack Obama uses it in "Dreams from my Father" but very few other modern writers.  This is a shame because genealogy can be a very powerful and very neat storytelling tool.  In Matthew 1 we have a genealogy that, amongst many other things, tells the story of God's faithfulness to the person at the start of the genealogy (Abraham) and also very neatly shows the place of one of the most scandalous figures in the early story of Jesus the Messiah, his mother Mary.

It's all to do with making babies

Abraham was promised descendants.  He was promised lots and lots and lots of them.  So many they would impossible to count.  This is one of the reasons that the Bible employs genealogy as such a powerful story telling tool.  This dead end couple, Abram and Sarai, become the founders of a family that Matthew proudly lists only one tree of and that continues on to this day with millions of descendants of Abraham in Israel and around the world.

God promised babies to Abraham and here they all are given in their promise fulfilling generations.

Where does Mary fit in to this story then?  This genealogy is different from many others in the Bible in that it not only lists the baby boys but also the girls too.  Each of the women in this list are marked out by being someone wreathed in some form of scandal.  Tamar plays the part of a prostitute to force the men in her society to give her and her dead husband their rights.  Rahab is a real prostitute and an outsider to Israel.  Ruth is an accursed Moabite who through her loving kindness overturns the laws of Deuteronomy.  Bathsheba is the adulteress who becomes involved in a plot that ends in the murder of her husband.  God forgives both her and David and allows them to be part of his historical plan for his Messiah.

At the end of this scandalous list Mary's own scandal is laid out for all the world to see.  People knew where babies came from in those days and it took angelic intervention for even a righteous man like Joseph to accept that this miracle of virgin birth was the work of God.  What happens is scandalous and shocking to the people of Israel but it is no different from how God worked with Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, Bathsheba and the many other women of the Bible through whom God fulfilled his promise to Abraham that through him all nations would be blessed.

Next time you see a genealogy in the Bible don't let your eyes glaze over and be tempted to skim it.  It might just tell you a powerful story of how God works faithfully with broken and unlikely people.


Matthew 1
New International Version (NIV)
The Genealogy of Jesus the Messiah

1 This is the genealogy[a] of Jesus the Messiah[b] the son of David, the son of Abraham:

2 Abraham was the father of Isaac,
Isaac the father of Jacob,
Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers,
3 Judah the father of Perez and Zerah, whose mother was Tamar,
Perez the father of Hezron,
Hezron the father of Ram,
4 Ram the father of Amminadab,
Amminadab the father of Nahshon,
Nahshon the father of Salmon,
5 Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab,
Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth,
Obed the father of Jesse,
6 and Jesse the father of King David.
David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah’s wife,
7 Solomon the father of Rehoboam,
Rehoboam the father of Abijah,
Abijah the father of Asa,
8 Asa the father of Jehoshaphat,
Jehoshaphat the father of Jehoram,
Jehoram the father of Uzziah,
9 Uzziah the father of Jotham,
Jotham the father of Ahaz,
Ahaz the father of Hezekiah,
10 Hezekiah the father of Manasseh,
Manasseh the father of Amon,
Amon the father of Josiah,
11 and Josiah the father of Jeconiah[c] and his brothers at the time of the exile to Babylon.
12 After the exile to Babylon:
Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel,
Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel,
13 Zerubbabel the father of Abihud,
Abihud the father of Eliakim,
Eliakim the father of Azor,
14 Azor the father of Zadok,
Zadok the father of Akim,
Akim the father of Elihud,
15 Elihud the father of Eleazar,
Eleazar the father of Matthan,
Matthan the father of Jacob,
16 and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, and Mary was the mother of Jesus who is called the Messiah.
17 Thus there were fourteen generations in all from Abraham to David, fourteen from David to the exile to Babylon, and fourteen from the exile to the Messiah.

Joseph Accepts Jesus as His Son

18 This is how the birth of Jesus the Messiah came about[d]: His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant through the Holy Spirit. 19 Because Joseph her husband was faithful to the law, and yet[e] did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly.

20 But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. 21 She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus,[f] because he will save his people from their sins.”

22 All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: 23 “The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel”[g] (which means “God with us”).

24 When Joseph woke up, he did what the angel of the Lord had commanded him and took Mary home as his wife. 25 But he did not consummate their marriage until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.

Friday 29 April 2011

Good boring leadership


Of course, you know all about Tola, the great leader of Israel, dont you? 

Don't you?

Well his name was Tola and he ruled for 23 years.  He was from a town called Shamir, where he was buried when he died.

There are no accounts of great battles during the time he judged Israel, no great massacres, no conquests, controversies or calamities. Just plain old, boring old running of the country, carrying out justice and adminsitering God's laws.

If only all the Bible's rulers were that boring and that good.  If only our own, present day rulers were as boringly efficient.

Tuesday 26 April 2011

Introduction to Gideon


It's funny how some bits of scripture are really well known and some are more or less forgotten.  Everyone remembers that Jews shouldn't eat pigs but few people remember the ban on prawns.  Everyone remembers David but Rehoboam isn't all that well known. Everyone remembers the ban on "lying with a man" but few people remember the ban on mixed fibres in your clothes (maybe the God Hates Fags crew should switch to God hates Polycotton!).

Which brings me to Gideon. One of the big famous bits in the Bible.  The start of his story is really well known but the ending is less so.  You can see why the start is famous from the few verses in today's reading.  I think we all love the idea of the guy plucked from obscurity by an angel to rescue his people from the maurauding invaders.  He certainly doesn't come across as hero material.  Far from tearing down his father's idols publicly he works at night out of fear.  He argues with God and more or less tells him off for negligence (despite the fact that his family own the shrines to Baal and Asherah in town) but in the end, like Moses before him, he finally quits with the excuses and gets on with the job of liberation.

The end of the story is not as good as the beginning. Like many a Middle Eastern dictator before him what starts well ends in fratricidal conflict but maybe we are right to celebrate and remember the successful start rather than the unhappy ending.  I hope in the future if anyone gets round to remembering my life then something of the same selective process might occur and the good will be remembered and the bad bits forgotten.

Proverbs 14 verse 4


We had a new family in church on Sunday and their daughter was VERY noisy. So much so that the mother took her out just as communion started.  The family were embarrassed and said at the end that this was one of the reasons that they hadn't been to church for a long time.  We tried to reassure them that this was OK and that after a few weeks she would settle in.  Hopefully they will be back.

I was thinking of them when I read today's Proverbs reading.  "An empty stable is easily kept clean but there is no profit from an empty stable."  We could keep our church as a pristine temple of pure quiet worship but it would be sterile without children and their noises.  We would be an empty stable, nice and clean but a stable without profit.

Saturday 23 April 2011

The Bible debates with... The Bible


Judges 1:1-2:9

Luke 21:29-22:13

Psalm 90:1-91:16

Proverbs 13:24-25

Much as it's tempting to comment on Adoni Bezek with his 70 kings with no thumbs and big toes (Don't human beings have most amazing imagination when it comes to torture and humiliation!) I think the much more interesting bit in the Old Testament passages to refer to are the two psalms put back to back.

Psalms 90 and 91 show how the Bible sometimes engages in debate with itself over issues such as the suffering of God's people.  Both Psalms start in a similar way with the statement that God is our home or refuge but then they diverge very sharply indeed.  Psalm 90, one of the Psalms of Moses (was being a poet compulsory for being an Israeli leader?) moves on from that statement to present what feels like a very harsh and distant view of God as the one who lives forever but sweeps human beings aside like dry grass in his anger.  Moses speaks with a voice of faith but pleads for God's anger to be lifted.  Maybe this the voice of someone who has put up with wilderness wandering for far too long.

Psalm 91 carries almost the opposite message.  This speaks of the God who rescues us from every trap, every plague, every hopeless looking battle.  In this psalm the impression is given that if only we had the faith of Moses then everything would be OK and we would be always striding boldly onwards in the power of God.

The truth is that both messages speak to different aspects of our walk with Jesus.  Sometimes it feels like Psalm 90, sometimes like Psalm 91.  God is always there whether our sins weigh us down or our victories make us soar.  It shows us the honest nature of the Bible that it reflects both of these realities even though they contradict one another from our perspective.  This offends some people who do not want to see contradiction or debate in the Bible because they have swallowed a Modernist view of inspiration that says that scripture cannot be inspired if it contradicts itself in places.  But life is contradictory!  As it says in Ecclesiastes there is a time for one thing and there is also a time for it's opposite or contradiction even sometimes side by side in two neighbouring Psalms.

Friday 22 April 2011

One Year Bible


The Proverbs reading today has this line - "A poor person's farm may produce much food but injustice sweeps it away."

I go into schools quite regularly to talk about Fairtrade and try to encourage young people to think about the things they buy.  Invariably some kid will ask a question something along these lines - "Why do people in the Third World always need our money?" Or "Why are they always poor and asking for our help?"

It's a good question. From the perspective of the teenagers that I'm talking to Africa has always had its hand out begging.  What they don't realise is that Africa is one of the richest continents on the planet. It's mineral wealth is staggering.  Think of diamonds in Sierra Leone and South Africa, it's agricultural wealth is incredible. Think of how much food Zimbabwe alone was once able to produce.  Even Ethiopia, a place synonymous with famine, manages to keep Starbucks going year after year with gorgeous coffee.

And so I have to answer them in words very similar to those in the Proverbs reading.  They beg because we steal.  They beg because the injustice of a world trade system that is set up to make the rich richer and the poor working harder drives nations that would otherwise be wealthy in their own right to sell their riches at knock-down prices.

Part of me hates the look of confusion that is often generated when teenagers begin to see how their world is set up but hopefully one or two will be inspired to get angry rather than confused and go out some day and make a difference in this world to fix some of that injustice.

For more info go to -

www.fairtrade.ie

www.flo.org